Thursday, April 30, 2009

Pakistani TV Journalist Takes Camera Inside Swat Valley

By Ravi Khanna
Washington
30 April 2009

With Pakistan's Swat Valley under Taliban control, worldwide interest about how life has changed in the region has grown. Prominent Pakistani journalist Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy recently went to investigate, spending two days in the valley to produce a documentary for the PBS television program Frontline, which is being streamlined online.

Film-maker Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy

Film-maker Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy

"How war is killing children in Pakistan but also turning children into killers," is the theme of film-maker Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy's PBS documentary, Children of the Taliban. She says her film is about what happens to the residents of Swat Valley when the Taliban militants move in.
"I think their whole policy is to create chaos. And the first way they do it is by banning women from leaving their homes, by making sure there is very little freedom, she says, "Then they go house to house knocking on doors asking families to donate their children to the Army of Islam, as they like to call themselves."
Her journey begins at a rehabilitation center in Peshawar, where she talks with some of the young victims caught in the crossfire of this war.
Later she walks through the rubble of a school destroyed by the Taliban that once taught 400 girls, and comes across two nine-year old girls who used to study there. The militants have a policy of destroying schools for girls.  
At the schools the Taliban runs for boys known as madrasas, poor families are often attracted by the food and shelter provided.
One Swat teenager explains how he joined the Taliban a year ago, when he was 13. First, he says, he was attracted by the sermons at the mosque, then he was recruited at a madrassa, and finally spent months in military training.
The revealing images portrayed in the documentary raise the question of why did the Taliban allow Sharmeen to film a documentary inside their stronghold?
"They think that by getting their message out, people will start subscribing to their ideology. What they don't realize is that they are espousing such a violent ideology that people are bound to get turned off by it," she said.
Fighting in the Swat valley has displaced thousands of people, many of whom now live in refugee camps.
In the documentary, two young men are featured among the hundreds of displaced children. Wasifullah and Abdurrahman are best friends.
Wasifullah says his 12 year old cousin was killed by an American missile strike on his village near the Afghan border. So he wants to join the Taliban.
But his best friend Abdurrahman blames al-Qaida for the destruction of their village. He would prefer to become a captain in the Pakistan Army.
Sharmeen says the two friends sadly represent the fault lines in the unstable country that Pakistan has become.
She says she also met with a 14 year old boy who was trained to be a suicide bomber. "He had gone through a formal six-week training course with the Taliban," she says, "and he was recruited from a local mosque in the Swat valley"
She is told by a Taliban recruiter that there is nothing wrong in using children because they are tools to achieve God's will. If you are figting, he says, then God provides you with the means.
She says there are 80 million children in Pakistan, many of them living in poverty. If the militants continue to expand their war and to recruit children freely, as they do now she says, then Pakistan may soon belong to them.

Source

Peace protest in Mingora, Troubled Swat Valley

Residents of Mingora capital of Pakistani troubled valley of Swat seen at a peace-demanding protest rally.

Blood Emeralds: Feeding the Taliban in Swat

Urvashi J Kumar
Research Officer, IPCS
e-mail:
urvashi@ipcs.org


Afghanistan’s Taliban have poppy’s lucre to fund their operations and their Pakistani brethren have found a friend in emeralds. Swat’s emeralds, some of the finest available in the world and next only to the ones mined in Colombia, are now under the control of the Taliban, who in a span of four months have occupied two of the largest mines in Swat and in a remarkable show of efficiency, have already started round-the-clock mining operations where workers share up to 50 per cent of their daily find with the Taliban. Most emeralds mined here range from just under a carat to over five and fetch anywhere between US$1,000 to over US$100,000 in the international market. What funds like these can do for the coffers of the Taliban is not very hard to imagine. What is hard to imagine is the complete absence of alarm and state inaction over these rich mines being taken over by the Taliban.
Interestingly and rather disturbingly, Pakistan press coverage on the issue has remained low, just like it had been when the Taliban meticulously defaced a 23-foot high statue of a meditating Buddha, dating back to the 7th century, carved in a rock at a Jehanabad village in October 2007 which led to an international outrage. Swat’s emerald mines are seemingly the latest victims of state apathy and media disregard. 
Reports of the Fiza Ghat mines falling in the hands of the Taliban first appeared in the international press almost four months after the takeover and were subsequently published by the Pakistan press as a truncated news item 48 hours later. The Gojaro Killay Amnavi mine takeover was reported by an Indian news agency and found space in Pakistan’s press, exactly as it was published, over 24 hours after the first report; a clear indication of the seriousness or the lack of it attached to these events in Pakistan.
It was about four months ago that the Taliban reportedly took control of the mines in Fiza Ghat, said to hold largest deposits of emeralds in South Asia along with the Panjshir mines in Afghanistan, located in the mountains that ring Mingora. These mines, said to have been under government control before violent unrest swept through the Swat Valley, have in their heyday between 1978 and 1988 yielded a quarter of a million carats of emeralds. The second takeover took place on 1 April, when over 70 armed militants stormed into the mine at Gojaro Killay Amnavi area in Shangla district which had been leased by the Pakistan government to the US firm Luxury International for Rs.40 million a year but the firm discontinued their work at the mine when violence in Swat saw an upsurge. Within a day armed militants reportedly started mining operations after employing about a 1000 local people as workers and have also built trenches and bunkers. 
According to reports, the costs of mining at both locations are being split equally between the workers and the Taliban who run the operations based on Sharia; which translates into clear threat of amputation for theft and harsh punishment for breaking any other rules laid down by the Taliban. This in effect means that only those with strong Taliban sympathies have been allowed to work in the mines, giving the lie to the Taliban argument that the mines have been reopened to ensure employment and a better life for the local people.
These mines now represent another Pandora’s Box of troubles for Islamabad. Not only does it lose out on revenue that is now in the hands of the Taliban for financing their operations, the emeralds now being mined here are nothing less than conflict emeralds and should ideally come under sharp international scrutiny which can only mean more pressure on the Pakistan political top brass. 
Africa’s conflict diamonds resulted in an international campaign that resulted in the Kimberly Process, initiated in May 2000 and finalised in November 2002, proving that consensus can be reached and action taken within a short span of time if the will to do so exists. The vast misuse of precious metals and stones to fund conflict subsequently led to the Madison Dialogue, launched in August 2006 that aims at promoting verified sources of precious metal, diamonds and other minerals. 
Members of the international community and even the Pakistan government have the means and know the ways to take action against what can possibly be as troublesome a thorn as the illegal poppy trade of Afghanistan. Exploitation of these mines and their fine emeralds to fund bloodshed is not a far-fetched plausibility but a reality that needs to be faced and for this the Pakistan media, civil society, government and international community need to come together in a concerted effort to save Swat’s fine emeralds from the tinge of blood.

Source

Related Stuff:

Back to arms

Thursday, April 30, 2009


Finally, after a lull that has simply allowed militants to re-group, re-arm and re-plan, a military operation has resumed. In Dir and in Buner, the armed forces seem to have gone after the Taliban militants with full force. President Zardari and General Kayani have met, with the COAS giving an assurance that they can tackle the militants. Once more we see people fleeing homes and villages. Perhaps things could be made easier for them by dealing with the militants once and for all, rather than prolonging the process so that it expands across weeks and months and years. As gun-ship helicopters pound the rugged countryside of Buner and troops regain control of some key areas from the militants, we must ask why decision makers continue to play foolish games. The 'stop and start' tactics serve no purpose at all; this time round they have simply allowed the Swat Taliban to make even louder threats and to strut before TV cameras as 'victors'. Even now, our leaders continue to pretend the 'accord' in Swat is still viable. We have as yet to hear it being criticized for the farce that it is by any major party. The attitude adopted, during TV interviews and elsewhere, is apologetic. It took civil society, whose members turned out in large numbers at the General Post Office in Lahore, to dispatch angry letters to the president questioning the Nizam-e-Adl to forcefully bring out this point of view and end a situation where we spoke of it only in whispers.
It is time we stopped shuffling our feet like hesitant schoolboys. It has become necessary to go after the Taliban with all the force we can muster. This is a fact that must be faced, no matter how difficult it may be to wage war within our own county. The militants have already created havoc through a campaign aimed at creating fear. This time round we must not succumb to the tactics of blackmail. The Swat Taliban has now openly threatened to attack targets across the country if the 'deal' struck with them breaks down. This may, admittedly, not be entirely a bluff – but the fact is that what we know now is no peace either. There is an element of a nightmare in all that is happening. We need to shake it off so that a more pleasant vision for the future can replace it.
To achieve this, the lessons of the past must be learnt. In Dir and in Buner, troops have demonstrated they are quite capable of dealing with the irregular fighters they face. The politicians and the military leadership must now demonstrate they are capable of putting on a true show of team spirit. There must not be any doubt as to who the enemy is or the kind of threat these forces pose. We have heard far too many words – in the form of promises and assurances – over the past few weeks. What we need now is to see action and a demonstration that there is a true willingness to take on the thugs who have been responsible for a wave of crime which they, as yet, have not in any way been penalized for.

Source

Clear and present danger from the Taliban

Thursday, April 30, 2009
Ikram Sehgal


The nine years' delay in agreeing upon a Constitution for Pakistan was because of ambiguity about what role Islam would play in governance, and how this role could be incorporated into the Constitution. Deciding this in a Muslim-majority state was unprecedented, complicated by 79 members forming the Constituent Assembly coming from different walks of life. Their understanding about what Islam was and how it should be practiced differed substantially.
Detailed discussions resulted in the "Objectives Resolution" being agreed to in 1949. This resolution never attracted criticism or rejection because its understanding of Islam is very broad and inclusive. It was later incorporated into successive Constitutions. It reads: "Whereas sovereignty over the entire universe belongs to Allah Almighty alone and authority which he has delegated to the State of Pakistan through its people for being exercised within the limits prescribed by Him is a sacred trust; This Constitution Assembly representing the people of Pakistan resolves to frame a Constitution wherein the State shall exercise its powers and authority through the chosen representatives of the people; Wherein the principles of democracy, freedom, equality, tolerance and social justice as enunciated by Islam shall be fully observed; Wherein the Muslims shall be fully enabled to order their lives in the individual and collective spheres in accordance with the teachings and requirements of Islam as set out in the Holy Quran and the Sunnah."
Unfortunately, the content and meaning of the resolution and its importance thereof was never explained to the people. If Maulana Sufi Mohammad had been educated about the spirit of that resolution in his younger years he probably would have avoided making insulting and false remarks about the Constitution of Pakistan, and about democracy and its institutions.
Composed of people with different ethnic, cultural, religious and social backgrounds, Pakistan is not a country in the European or Western sense. Among Sindhis, Baloch, Pashtuns and Punjabis are urban dwellers, rural and tribal populations, there are also Christians, Parsis and Hindus. Our lawmakers in 1949 obviously understood that fact much better than many of us do today.
The Holy Quran tells us we are not responsible for the beliefs and worship of others, all communities having been created by the same God differently for a reason: so that we may know each other and may recognise that underlying all our differences – religious, ethic and otherwise – we all have something in common which unites us: we are all children of the same Creator. Those who follow a wrong path, who deny the truth will be made responsible for their deeds individually when Judgement Day comes. But in this world God has ordained no compulsion in religion; not even if I think I am right and I know much better than everybody else what is right and what is wrong.
Mullah Sufi Muhammad thinks he alone is right and wants to impose his version of the Truth on everybody. That is wrong, it is un-Islamic, a sure recipe for disaster in a diverse society as the Pakistani one. With corruption a blight on their lives, bereft of inexpensive justice at their doorstep that the Wali of Swat gave them before 1969, worn out by conflict and missing protection from the Pakistani State, the people of Swat welcomed Sufi Muhammad's promise of honesty, elusive peace and justice.
Outside the valley, outside the Pashtun areas and outside the Taliban way of thinking there are millions of other Pakistanis, Muslim and non-Muslims, educated, uneducated, urban dwellers and rural population, rich and poor. They do disagree with the mullah's ideas and understanding. The Holy Quran and the Constitution of Pakistan gave them a right to be different, to think differently, and to live differently. While the Quran and our Constitution are inclusive documents of a diversified but united Islamic civilisation, Sufi Mohammad wants to be exclusive, that all others are wrong and need to be corrected, that he knows much better than all those who disagree. It is Sufi Mohammad who is acting against the spirit of the Quran and the spirit of our Constitution, it is time to tell him this in no uncertain terms.
By attempting the peace agreement in Swat, the ANP government showed real Islamic spirit by conceding that different interpretations of the Sharia have a right to be exercised. They gave Sufi Muhammad the opportunity to demonstrate his version of Islam in Swat, the condition being it should be a peaceful exercise, not a violent one. We are seeing the exact opposite. It exposed Sufi Muhammad camouflaged as a man of peace when he really is a convenient mouthpiece for his brutal son-in-law, Maulana Fazlullah. The Taliban kept their guns, have attacked the FC, looted and destroyed offices of the state and of NGOs, violating not only the peace agreement but also the spirit of the Pakistani Constitution and of Islam. We cannot and should not tolerate this.
The well–intentioned but ill-advised game plan for peace put the Army into a no-win Catch-22 situation, damned for not doing enough when they were in fact on the verge of success, damned as such by some for doing too much. The Army has to wake up as to who is badmouthing them, why, and more crucially, where? A national government can restore the credibility of the state with respect to governance, a democratic "doctrine of necessity" measuring those who govern to be symbols of honesty and integrity. Otherwise, we are playing hypocrisy with the destiny of the nation. Terrorism may be the present focus of our prime attention, priority must eliminate the root causes thereof, corruption and injustice. Anyone who says otherwise does so with ulterior motives.
The concept of a "clear and present danger" enunciated by US Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes involved the "freedom of spesech" and licence thereof. A man starts yelling "fire, fire" in a movie theatre, the stampede towards the exits results in injuries (even deaths) among the cinemagoers. Restraining the man or punishing him would technically violate his freedom of speech, allowing such "freedom" would result in injuries and deaths to innocent bystanders, what should be the logical course of justice? When any individual misuses any freedom (in this case of speech), endangering others in any manner, Judge Holmes maintained that the concept of application of justice must recognise the situation as a "clear and present danger" and the individual must be restrained, relying more on the tenets of logic rather than the pure letter of the law.
The Taliban in Swat constitute a "clear and present danger" to the state of Pakistan. That danger needs to be eliminated. (Acknowledging with gratitude research by Dr Bettina Robotka (IBA), Karachi.)


The writer is a defence and political analyst. Email: isehgal@pathfinder9.com

 

Source

Imagining the Taliban

Set the poll rolling


Thursday, April 30, 2009
Farzana Versey


If you do not look at the candidates, the manifestoes and the daily dose of quotes, then you might begin to think that India is voting in the Pakistani elections. Sorry if this sounds insensitive, but the Taliban crisis is what has made the marketing guys tout these as the most important elections in India.
Of the times I have visited Islamabad, I had never heard of Buner. These days, Indian news channel anchors talk about Buner as though it were something in their exclusive backyards. Is this fear psychosis, the ragged remains of the Mumbai attacks which are raked up by every group with chiffon saree and pearls and cotton-silk kurtas and striped ties? These are women and men who are rolling the word 'Bun-air' blithely and lithely off their tongues.
Isn't that why if we cut through the swathe of national issues, then the real vote is against terrorism? The only terrorism we seem to recognise comes from across the border. The more serious media show us scruffy-looking men, heavily armed and bearded, crossing hills. Their destination, we are told, is India and they are supposedly the Taliban. When they realise this sounds ridiculous, they change it to jihadis. The subtle difference having raised the bar of their consciousness, they become eligible to be considered with more gravitas.
It is shocking to hear intelligent commentators hallucinate that if the Taliban were to reach Karachi, they could threaten us. We now even have a reason: some of the 26/11 terrorists did use the sea route. But are they interested in India? The Taliban, or at least Pashtun elements, have always been an important source of anxiety and anger among the Karachiites. They have business dealings there and this would be a part of their spreading the message and taking over Pakistan agenda, if it is that. India does not matter to them politically or even strategically.
I am, therefore, surprised that a retired colonel joined the bandwagon and sought to write an open letter to General Pervez Kayani stating: "Sir, it is imperative that we recognise our enemy without any delay. I use the word 'our' advisedly – for the Taliban threat is not far from India's borders. And the only force that can stop them from dragging Pakistan back into the Stone Age is the force that you command… the future of humankind in the subcontinent rests with you." This is utterly debasing not only to Pakistani civil society but also to the Indian electorate that is being brainwashed with such damaging information and homilies. Interestingly, the onus is being placed on the army, an army that was sought to be thrown out in democratic elections.
While the army in Pakistan has had running tenures for long periods of time, it is in fact often a puppet in the hands of the democrats. After all, it was Zulfikar Ali Bhutto who asked Yahya to arrest Mujibur Rehman. He then took over as leader and promptly released Mujib and arrested Yahya! The only common fallout was that India had to deal with Bangladeshi immigrants and Pakistan with the Afghan mujahideen during the Soviet incursion.
Pakistan, and not merely the extreme north, has had to deal with bomb blasts; these were not engineered by the Taliban. There are regional and linguistic issues. How serious can a discourse be if it chooses to use an American newspaper's puff prophecy? The CIA had branded Pervez Musharraf as among the ten worst dictators. None of these certificates or crystal ball gazers bothers to provide even broad definitions of what they mean by 'dictator' and, more importantly, 'collapse'.
The economy has collapsed, starting with the west. Did they anticipate it? Elected governments collapse when they are voted out of power. There is a collapse when Israel puts a blockade around Gaza and denies its people basic facilities. Essential services collapse when there are strikes by trade unions – legitimate dissenters. How many more examples of collapse should be provided to explain in perspective that New York Times cannot be taken at face value?
Pakistan, the Taliban and jihad are catch-phrases that might work, especially during election time, but it is rather tragic that so soon after the Assam blasts and the Naxalites going on a killing spree, we have moved on to the Taliban. There is something called ULFA (United Liberation Front of Asom) that has been in existence for years and they in fact are working on a separatist notion that there is some feeble stipulation for and the Naxal Maoist forces constitute the extreme wing of the left, a big party in the electoral process.
One is waiting for an open letter to our army chief regarding the 100 terrorists who have reportedly 'sneaked into Jammu and Kashmir' (one had no idea they would seek permission!). The only thing in our favour is that we are still a democracy with no constitutional provision for a theocracy. Maybe, the good colonel would like to convey that to those propagating dreams of a Hindu Rashtra.


The writer is a Mumbai-based columnist and author of the book A Journey Interrupted: Being Indian in Pakistan, Harper Collins, India. Email: kaaghaz.kalam@gmail.com

Source

Go where?

Thursday, April 30, 2009


The DG ISPR and the interior minister on April 28 said that the Taliban would be forced to withdraw from Dir and Buner and go elsewhere. Is that enough? Where will the Taliban go from these places? The 19-month-long military operation did not succeed in capturing or killing Fazlullah, Muslim Khan and others whose men have killed 2,000 innocent people. The armed forces only claimed that the Taliban were being forced to withdraw and we observed that this policy resulted in spreading the writ of the Taliban in surrounding areas. Now it is high time that the security forces should immediately arrest Fazlullah, Muslim Khan and all other killers of innocent people.
They should seize the FM radio channels and give a message to all other militants. This should be the first step in the ongoing operation. If it is not done, we shall believe that there is something wrong at the bottom. Withdrawal of the Taliban is meaningless unless their leaders are arrested and tried for their crimes. Otherwise, all that will happen is that they will move from one place to another.


Bashir Hussain Azad
Chitral

No Taliban in Chitral, please

Thursday, April 30, 2009


For the past one month the people of Swat and other adjoining areas were looking for the betterment of the situation in Swat. But alas after a period of almost one month nothing has happened. Sufi Mohammad's sole gift has been to enable the Taliban of Swat to advance into Buner, Shangla and Dir. Given the prevailing situation, people of Chitral like me are living in the fear that after a few months these Taliban will also enter the peaceful and beautiful area of Chitral. Surely, the government will have realised that the deal is bringing anything but peace to the region.


Rahim Aman Shah
Islamabad

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Open letter to President Zardari

Wednesday, April 29, 2009


We the citizens of Pakistan are angry and dismayed at the abject capitulation of the state of Pakistan before the Taliban insurgents in Swat. With one stroke of the pen, you and parliament have signed away any real prospects of a stable, tolerant and progressive Pakistan as envisioned by its founder, Mohammad Ali Jinnah. Leaving aside the merits or demerits of the Nizam-e-Adl Regulation, we believe that any agreement signed at the point of a gun can never lead to a lasting and just peace. It has now become clear how naive the government has been in thinking that the Taliban could be contained in Swat. Since you signed the regulation, the Taliban have stated that that they don't intend to lay down their arms, have called into question the legitimacy of parliament and the Supreme Court, and declared the intent to impose their own brand of violent and brutal Sharia not only in the rest of Pakistan but across the world! This is proof positive that the real aim of the Taliban is to seize power through brutal force and intimidation. We reject the argument that the Pakistan army did not fight a counter insurgency because it did not want to kill its own people. We realise that the dark clouds of obscurantism hanging over our country are the direct result of a 'jihadi' mindset within sections of the civil and military establishment, which has for decades fostered and pandered to religious zealots and regressive forces in the country.
None of the above, however, absolves you and the government from mobilising the state machinery and the people of Pakistan against the existential threat facing us; the 'buck stops with you, Mr President!' It is incumbent upon you to compel the army to come to the aid of a constitutionally elected government and enforce the writ of the state in Swat and other troubled regions of Pakistan.
The failure of the government to evolve a counter-narrative to the Taliban propaganda is dereliction of the highest order. The government must immediately devise and implement a strategy for countering the insidious propaganda by and in support of the Taliban, which fills newspaper columns and airwaves. Peace, Mr President, cannot come by ceding territorial control to armed insurgents or by agreeing to their illegitimate demands, as has been done in Swat. Countries that have faced violent insurgencies in the past – Colombia, Egypt or Algeria – did not succeed in their wars by negotiating from a position of weakness, or by burying their heads in the sand. These countries employed all means, including the use of force, to fight those who sought to seize power and territory through violent means. Mr President, we too must fight the Taliban, who have chosen to fight against the state and who routinely terrorise and kill innocent Pakistanis. It is incumbent upon you to mobilise the nation against the scourge of the Taliban before it is too late. History and the people of this country will never forgive you if you fail to show leadership now.


Concerned citizens of Pakistan

Rise up against the Taliban

Wednesday, April 29, 2009


We need to stop blaming the US drone attacks for the Taliban's rapid advances in Pakistan. We have a habit of blaming all the ills in our society on others, starting with the ever-green whipping boys the Jews, Americans and Indians -- who are blamed for just about everything that goes wrong in Pakistan. What we need to do is to look in the mirror and place responsibility where due. What is happening in Pakistan right now is our collective fault and cannot be blamed simply by saying that it is a reaction to the drone attacks. The question is simple enough: will the Taliban lay down their arms and stop advancing if the US drone attacks are stopped? The answer clearly is that they will do no such thing because what they are after is power.
As for the Americans, they have their own national interest in mind, not ours -- and the harsh truth is that there is nothing wrong with that. If we have less corruption and are able to provide the masses with a good system of justice and governance, the breeding ground for extremism and the Taliban will be eliminated. Pakistanis – wake up! Look in the mirror and change.


A Rauf
Islamabad


*****
It is very easy to sit in a well-guarded home and issue statements against the Taliban -- this is precisely what our prime minister seems to be doing on a daily basis. The Taliban, by their actions, have shown quite clearly that they care two hoots for written agreements. It is indeed shameful to see that our rulers are just fiddling while the country burns.
Surely, statements alone -- however well-intentioned and strong they may be -- cannot stop the Taliban from advancing. We spend so much of our budget on the military and what do we get in return? With so much heavy spending, our army should be well-equipped to clip the wings of the Taliban -- and I can only wonder what is taking it so long to take on the Taliban.


Badar Ul Islam
Peshawar


*****
It has become evident that our nation has realised the threat the Taliban pose to our identity and to our home, Pakistan. When the people support a cause, nothing can come in their way. When they stood behind the restoration of the deposed judges, the judges were restored. It is time to teach these cowards a lesson who have not only distorted the meaning of our religion but are now trying to impose their own rule over our motherland. By usurping the rights of women, terming democracy and parliament un-Islamic, destroying schools and displaying their barbaric acts with great pride, I thank the Taliban, for having awakened Pakistanis and making them see the reality. We have had enough, we must rise against them for if we stand up, they will have no haven or shelter. United we stand, divided we fall. It's time for us to shun all differences, become united and save Pakistan.


Hafsa Khawaja
Lahore


*****
I believe that the nation should stand firm in giving support to the latest military action in Dir given that so much is at stake. Statements like the one published in newspapers on April 27 by the leader of a local religious group in Buner where he says that he does not want the government to send the army in because that would create a Swat-like situation are quite baffling. These mullahs will be the death of Pakistan if not confronted. Buner as we all know fell without putting any fight whatsoever, and there is no way that the people of Buner will stand up to the Taliban, at least without the government's help. The same people who were involved in the lawyers' movement should now protest against the Taliban and send them a message that the people will not tolerate them trying to take control of the country or any of its regions.


Harris Durrani
Toronto


*****
We are a strange nation. When the Lal Masjid operation was not taking place, people urged the government to launch an operation against illegal activities of the Ghazi brothers. But soon after the operation ended, people started calling the army murderers of innocent children and women. Now Swat is facing the same situation. Some fanatics have taken the beautiful valley under siege by giving it an Islamic name of NAR and once again people of Pakistan are demanding the same action from our government and army, but what is the guarantee that history will not repeat itself? Recently the JUI-F took out a rally against an undergoing operation in Dir.


Khadeejah Usman
Islamabad


*****
It will be too late by the time we realise what the Taliban stand for. There shouldn't be any doubt now that their demand of Sharia is only a garb for their motive to have complete control over the land, destroy state's writ and our way of life. By the time we build a consensus on how to deal with them, they will be firmly in our midst. As to their religious and other senses, make no mistake, they are barbarians. Reasoning has no place in their lives because they move by instincts. Their main target besides security apparatus is society's middle class. It is paramount that we understand the threat and resolve to face it. Rehman Malik was right in saying 'either fight them out or hand over the state to them'.


Muhammad Daud
Rawalpindi


*****


Despite its many problems, Pakistan has managed to reach a position where its citizens can enjoy the fruits of technology and the safe umbrella of nuclear arms. Did we build our home to this level so that we can be the silent onlookers as we are taken aback to the Dark Ages? We have to save our home. The Taliban can't claim the ownership of Pakistan; we, the peace-loving Pakistanis, are the real owners of Pakistan. We can't tolerate any thieves taking charge of our plots, our cars, or even our mobile phones; then how are we tolerating these hooligans taking control of our motherland?
There is an immense need to stand united; but for that we need a platform. We need to stand united with our army; and the responsibility to provide us this platform lies on the shoulders of our leaders. I don't know how to operate a gun; in fact I have never touched one; but still I feel all geared up to fight back and contribute my bit in getting my country free from the shackles of insurgent militants. I would prefer to die while fighting back or at least while raising my voice. I am sure most Pakistanis think this way. They need to come together and make themselves heard.


Shanza Khan
Islamabad

Stop the Taliban advance

Wednesday, April 29, 2009
Rubina Saigol


The writer is a researcher specialising in social development
While all forms of colonisation and occupation spell disaster for the way of life of the conquered, whose institutions and systems are demolished and replaced by new ones, the most recent colonisation of large parts of Pakistan by the Taliban is by far the most dangerous one, as it seeks to destroy the very basis on which the state and society rest.
The Taliban occupation resembles most other forms of colonial occupation in a number of ways, including: 1) Forcible control over territory and large swathes of the population; 2) use of violence and force to accomplish political aims; 3) imposition of a specific minority version of religion not accepted or followed by the majority; 4) induction of collaborators from among the local people to further their aims; 5) planned demolition of the political, economic and social systems of the defeated; 6) belief in the superiority of the values, practices and systems of the coloniser, coupled with complete disregard for the culture and ways of the vanquished.
1. Forcible control over territory and population: The Taliban established control over large parts of FATA, a territory which was never properly integrated into Pakistan. In the past few months, the Taliban have speedily acquired control over Swat, first through armed violence and finally legally and politically through the Nizam-e-Adl agreement signed by President Zardari on April 13 and supported by Pakistan's elected assembly. As Farrukh Saleem informs us, the Pakistani state has ceded another 5,337 square kilometres of Pakistan adding to the 14,850 square kilometres of Chitral and 5,280 square kilometres of Dir which were already under the control of Sufi Muhammad's Tehreek-e-Nifaz-e-Shariat-e-Muhammadi. According to Dr Saleem this constitutes around 16 percent of our landmass.
Ecstatic over their triumph in Swat the Taliban quickly moved on to Buner, Shangla and are said to be close to Mansehra and Haripur and about 60 miles from Islamabad. They have openly declared that they will impose their own brand of Shariat on the whole of Pakistan and ultimately the entire Muslim world. Such imperial fantasies of world conquest portend disaster not only for Pakistan but for the world beyond.
2. Use of Violence for political aims: Like many other marauding hordes in history, the Taliban have demonstrated their enormous propensity for violence, brutality and savagery. The reign of terror in Swat before it finally fell involved beheading, murder, public display of decapitated bodies, flogging of women and cold-blooded murder of men and women accused of "immoral" behaviour in the Taliban's distorted code of morality. Those killed, butchered and tortured had not violated any Pakistani law while the Taliban have committed capital crimes against Pakistan's law and Constitution.
3. Imposition of minority religion: Pakistan constitutes a plural and multiple society where different religious groups, sects and beliefs have co-existed for centuries. There are Deobandis and Barelvis, Shias and Sunnis and followers of Sufi saints like Bulleh Shah, Sultan Bahoo, Sachchal Sarmast, Rehman Baba, Ghulam Farid, Khushhal Khan Khattak, Shah Abdul Lateef Bhitai and others. Additionally, Pakistan has a substantial population of Hindus in interior Sindh and Christians all over the country.
Pakistan is a multi-religious society where one single religion cannot be imposed on everyone. The Taliban represent a Wahhabi version of religion to which a tiny minority subscribes. Their notions of the universe represent a grotesque version of religion that carries no moral purpose other than its own imposition, and prohibits no crime, butchery or violence in single-minded pursuit of power, territory and control. Subsidised by the sale of poppy and the underground drug and arms trade, this version of "religion" makes a mockery of religion itself and reduces it to bloodshed, cruelty and barbarism. It is a version that has been rejected by mainstream religious leaders also.
4. Collaboration: Local and national administrations and political leaders of our country have become forced collaborators in the Taliban enterprise of destruction. The failure of our security forces to protect the country and its people has led to the capitulation by the National Assembly and the government to their illegal and unconstitutional demands. The fear generated by the no-holds-barred violence of the Taliban has led to the muting of any critique of their inhuman actions. The civilian government and legislators, dependent upon the police, administration and the army to protect civilians against the occupation of their country, had no choice but to relent when those responsible for protecting the country seemed to be retreating.
5. Demolition of political, economic and social systems: Like all colonisers, who entrench themselves in the society of the colonised and make sweeping changes in local systems and institutions, the Taliban have already threatened to destroy democracy which was only recently wrested from the hands of a dictator reluctant to relinquish control.
The Taliban have declared democracy, the judiciary and the Constitution as being western impositions to be removed by them once they gain power in Islamabad. They are not bothered by the obvious contradiction that they themselves are a product of the same western world that they so despise. Their version of religion comes from a westerly direction and is not an indigenous manifestation of the rich South Asian context.
Their own worldview comes from the west – from west Asia, to be more specific – and has no roots within the subcontinent which boasts syncretic versions of religion that are tolerant of difference and are peaceful in their actions. The Taliban threaten the essential multiplicity of South Asia and the traditional peaceful tolerance of its people by planning to transform the political, economic, social and cultural landscape of the country.
The worst sufferers of the Wahhabi imperialism that they represent will be women and the minorities, as is already evident. The Taliban's insecurities often tend to be focused on cultural and religious policing of the weaker sections of society. The prohibition of women's education and work – as well as of all music, art and higher culture – is as clear a sign of degradation as any and promises a world in which civilisation would become a thing of the past.
6. Belief in superiority: Like the former colonisers, whether Muslim or non-Muslim, the Taliban have a deeply embedded view of their own superiority. They believe that the cultural and social norms and values that they represent are better than those of most Pakistanis, and that it is the Bearded Man's Burden to correct the morals of society and inculcate higher values among the populace.
In spite of the fact that they kill, butcher, cut off limbs and heads with wild abandon and loot and plunder resources mercilessly (demonstrated by the takeover of the Emerald Mines), they project all their vices onto "the other." They accuse liberal and progressive people of lacking virtue, morality and piety. Yet, it is the Taliban who clearly lack any moral compass and have been reared on an ideology of hate, bloodshed and violence.
The onslaught of the Taliban must be resisted with all the resources at our disposal – administrative, political, military, intellectual and cultural. If we have to fight them, we must fight; if we have to dance and sing, we must dance and sing to challenge their Stone Age worldview and to assert our own humanity. It is no use blaming our civilian elected leaders for capitulating to the Taliban under pressure, as disappointing as that may be. The real issue is, why is a 600,000-strong army powerless against them? Why was the army not able to subdue an insurgency in Waziristan before the poison spread to the settled areas?
The Pakistani people give a huge chunk of their hard-earned resources to the army – the largest chunk after debt-servicing. All they want in return is protection, security and not abdication of responsibility. Why is a half-a-million-strong army ineffective against 5,000 marauders, criminals and thugs?
It has become our national pastime to blame only our elected governments when in reality they have no options and have been forced to accept Talibanisation of Swat due to the failures of others. If we do not fight back the Taliban today, we may not even live to regret it, for they will not spare our lives.


Email: rubinasaigol@hotmail.com

Source

Thank you, Sufi Mohammad

Wednesday, April 29, 2009
Asif Ezdi


NNWFP Chief Minister Amir Haider Hoti announced on April 21 that the government was facing a revolt in the province and that the salaries of the police were being doubled to cope with this threat. Hoti's warning calls to mind a similar foreboding expressed by the king of France at the time of the French Revolution. On July 12, 1789, two days before the storming of the Bastille, when the duke of La Rochefoucauld-Liancourt warned Louis XVI of the state of affairs in Paris, the king is said to have exclaimed, "This is a revolt." The duke's reply: "Non, sire, c'est une révolution." ("No, majesty, it is a revolution.")
In a revolt, only the ruler is toppled as a result of a popular uprising. But in a revolution, the entire ruling class is replaced. In our history, we have only known coup d'états, but neither a revolt nor a revolution. We do not know yet whether we are seeing the beginnings of a revolt or of a revolution in Pakistan. But whatever it is, it is certainly not a law and order problem and it is not going to be stopped by raising the salaries of policemen.
Our newspaper columns, airwaves and cyberspace have been saturated with the bloviations of our "liberal" commentators of different stripes chattering endlessly about the state being threatened by Islamic militants and extremists. In a rare display of unity, the apologists for our political class have also been saying the same thing. Hillary Clinton would be pleased that her call to the Pakistanis to speak out against the Taliban has been heeded.
Following in the footsteps of Musharraf, who not so long ago used to wax eloquent about how his brand of military dictatorship stood for enlightened moderation, the self-appointed protagonists of our hard-won democracy have been lamenting how our modern, enlightened way of life is being challenged by obscurantism and fundamentalism, when actually they are mostly defending only their class interests. Few, if any, votaries of this new enlightened moderation have pointed out that the Taliban movement in Swat has been able to win support among so many young men because the state has failed them, massively and comprehensively.
To portray the ferment in Swat as a medieval backlash against modernism is either a blinkered view or a deliberately misleading one. It ignores or tries to cover up the fact that the wellspring of Islamic militancy in Pakistan is to be found in the alienation of the mass of the population by a ruling elite which has used the state to protect and expand its own privileges, pushing the common man into deeper and deeper poverty and hopelessness. Past governments, whether military or civilian, dictatorial or democratic, have been little more than convenient tools of the privileged few for perpetuation of the status quo.
What has changed now is that people are much more aware of their rights – and their power. The availability of uncensored information on television has widened their horizons. In much of NWFP, the Afghan jihad gave them access to military training and modern weaponry: the Kalashnikov, the rocket launcher and the machine gun. With an annual population increase of four million in the whole country and an economy which is stagnant, there is a fast growing army of unemployed angry young men waiting to be recruited.
The turmoil in Swat and in the adjoining areas is being portrayed by some as a contest between obscurantism and enlightenment, between bigotry and tolerance and between extremism and moderation. Actually, it is more like a movement of the common man against vast disparities in wealth and the failure of the authorities to provide justice, jobs and those essential services like education and health for which governments are supposed to exist. In some areas at least, it has pitted landless tenants against wealthy landlords and there are reports that big landowners are being forced to leave the valley. Once such a movement gains momentum, it acquires its own uncontrollable dynamic. As Joseph de Maistre, a French political philosopher, wrote in 1796, it is not men who lead revolutions, but it is the revolution which employs men.
The appeal of the sharia and Islamic justice gives the Taliban an unparalleled ideological motivation. As the Persian saying goes, ham khorma wa ham sawab ast. There are rewards both in this world and the next. It is this combination of revolutionary and religious zeal which makes the Taliban such a formidable force. Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair came close to the truth in a speech on April 22 in which he likened militant Islam to revolutionary communism for its tenacity. It would not of course be the first time that what began as a religious movement also acquired the character of a socio-economic upheaval. Examples can be found in the history of most civilisations.
The Swat deal, it has been said, signifies a retreat from Jinnah's Pakistan, that it is a negation of his vision. A Pakistani journalist has equated the "capitulation in Swat" with the surrender document signed in Dhaka in 1971, incidentally a comparison first made by a retired colonel of the Indian army by the name of Harish Puri in an op-ed in this newspaper. All this is shocking, because it suggests that before the Nizam-e-Adl Regulation, Pakistan was well on the way to becoming the country of Quaid-e-Azam's conception. Nothing could be farther from the truth, because the retreat from Jinnah's Pakistan and the betrayal of his vision began much earlier. It started shortly after his death, continued under successive civilian and military governments and accelerated under military dictators, reaching its culmination with Musharraf. The responsibility for this betrayal lies not with the Taliban or Sufi Muhammad but largely with the same class which is now howling the loudest.
Fundamental to the Quaid's vision of Pakistan was the concept of Islamic social justice. But we have seen none of that in the policies of the government in the last six decades. Instead, the main role of the state has been to enable the ruling class to keep its hold on power, privilege and national wealth. The gap between a thin upper crust of the rich and the vast majority who live in privation is growing. Greed and rapacity have now been officially sanctioned by the NRO. An ordinary Pakistani born into destitution has little chance of breaking the shackles of poverty. The machinery of government, the political system and the upper classes are all arrayed against him.
In most countries, there is a single universal education system for all, which helps to blunt class differences. In Pakistan, not only is the level of school enrolment abysmally low, but there is a stratified school system which replicates and consolidates the class divisions. The elites send their children to the best schools which are beyond the means of the common man and which generally ensure a secure place in the system in later life. For the others, there are either the government schools or the madressas. Even the most talented of those who go to a government school find it hard to break the glass ceiling which keeps them down in the job market. And the most gifted of those educated in madressas become Taliban.
To accuse those who have risen against our exploitative socio-economic system of obscurantism is scandalous. In reality, it is Pakistan's ruling class, desperately clinging to its privileges, that is seeking to preserve an outdated medieval order. They are the ones who stand for obscurantism. We do not yet have a full-blown class conflict but the genie is out of the bottle and it cannot be put back in.
If – and that is a very big if – our ruling elite and the government are smart, they will have been jolted out of their complacency by the Swat deal and will have focussed their minds on issues of social justice. But that is unlikely. At least, they have been warned. Thank you, Sufi Muhammad.


The writer is a former member of the Pakistan Foreign Service. Email: asifezdi@yahoo.com

Source

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Taliban terror

Tuesday, April 28, 2009


In our cities, where there is more and more trepidation over the rapid Talibanization of the country, some comfort is still sought in the fact that the larger urban centres may well be able to ward off a similar threat. But can they? We have evidence in many places of the growing Taliban influence. In the Manga Mandi area of Lahore, local police thrashed in public three couples who they stated had been engaged in 'objectionable' behaviour. Rather than rejoice over this attempt to save them from immorality, local people expressed anger over the beating of women in the streets.
There are other incidents too. From Lahore, Karachi and Islamabad accounts come in of women being stopped in the streets and asked to cover their heads or 'dress decently'. The most dire accounts speak of threats to hurl acid. Co-educational schools, ironically enough even those imparting a religious education whose tiny pupils arrive in veils and caps, have been threatened. Some women drivers have reported harassment from youths on motorcycles. It is quite possible, indeed probable, that not all these incidents are true. But what such rumours do is create an environment of fear. This after all is what the terrorists want above all else. It is time that, as citizens, we fought back for our rights; for our space and for our right to live without constant fear. So far this struggle has not been taken up in earnest. It is time to push back the tide and rescue our nation from a fate that will jeopardize the future of all its citizens.

Source

Reclaim your country, your religion

Tuesday, April 28, 2009


There has been heartfelt outrage at the goings-on in Swat. The outrage and anger were and are necessary. A bunch of self-appointed mullahs forcing their will by an orgy of lethal violence on their own countrymen warrants repulsion. Thus the opprobrium is entirely deserved on those on which it is heaped. Talibanisation is no longer an abstract concept for Pakistanis, the self-proclaimed 'soldiers of religion', retained by deluded policy makers for 'strategic depth' and continuously flirted with by the religio-political class are proving to be as oppressive and brutal as their Afghan predecessors. Barring the Taliban sympathisers (JI, PTI et al), and the oddity of the PPP and ANP, self-proclaimed secularists, signing off on the deal, the condemnation has been universal. The president, the prime minister, the army chief, the judiciary, civil society, the MQM and even from the PML-N chief.
There is much breast-beating and punditry and parading of the same old excuses of foreign hands and one of the three As that is omnipresent as a reason. (Although one has to ask why would India or Russia wish to have a Caliphate installed in Pakistan?) If the readers of this newspaper and other media outlets are in anyway representative, than it appears that it has finally dawned on the population that there is a serious threat, not only to their way of life but very lives from these gangsters. It also indicates that, at least this constituency does not believe in Mr Sufi Mohammad's version of the religion. A line appears to have been drawn. On one side are obscurantist, violence and demagoguery (and their apologists who have never won their argument in a fair election). On the other side is the rest of Pakistan. All this could prove to be a catalyst for building a consensus about what kind of Pakistan should emerge, after the immediate crisis is diffused. Women have always suffered oppression in Pakistani society, but a vast majority seems to be saying, this far and no further; not even when you invoke religion to falsely justify such oppression. The brave stance of the Women Action Forum, in this regard, should be applauded.
The ideology of obscurantism thrives as others defer because the label of the religion is used as a political tool of subjugation. It is time that this stopped and the monopolisation of religion by all comers in the naked pursuit of power be challenged, without equivocation. At least in the minds of the thinking Pakistanis there should be absolutely no sympathy for this type of violence simply because the perpetrators associate themselves to religion. Similarly, apologists who claim one reason or another to rationalise wanton violence in pursuit of power must also be contested. A favourite argument of the apologists is always that it was the US that created these monsters or that this is the reaction of drone attacks and thus somehow justified. The former is akin to cutting your nose to spite your face and the latter highly dubious, in the case of the TNSM, and inherently perverse. Secondly, it is also important that those on side of humanity, tolerance and believers in the creed of live and let live do not allow the pursuit of the perfect to be the enemy of the good. This means that there has to be a consensus amongst those attempting to combat religious extremism and some compromise on the personal and political differences amongst them.
The government certainly should do more. For starters they should lay out and communicate what is the broad strategy for dealing with the current crisis? What exactly has been promised to the TNSM and how is it to be implemented? If there is no will or possibility of enforcing its writ in Swat and Malakand, the least the government should do is to negotiate a safe passage of refugees and help in their settlement in other parts of the country. The most important thing the government can do to strengthen tolerance and rule of law is to fulfil its manifesto promises of revival of the 1973 constitution and implementation of the charter of democracy. The reason regressive forces appear successful is because progressive elements of society can't seem to distinguish the wood from the trees and are too busy indulging in pursuit of the unobtainable at the cost of relinquishing the achievable.
The fight against obscurantism may yet require force but a more important battle is that of the minds. That is why it is important for the silent, peaceful majority of Pakistanis on the right side of the argument to set their differences aside and make their voices heard to reclaim their country and their religion from the regressive and obscurantist forces.


R Matif
London

Source

Talibanistan

Tuesday, April 28, 2009


If the government of Pakistan is still all-powerful in Swat, then why hasn't a single murderer been punished even though Muslim Khan gloatingly accepted responsibility for slaughtering Pakistani soldiers and policemen on TV and even said the Taliban recited the Kalima over them while slaughtering them? Instead, in a one-sided keeping with a peace deal broken blatantly by the Taliban time and again, our government has released the few Taliban who were arrested. If the sovereignty of Pakistan still prevails in Swat, then how can the militants restrict army movement or demand their removal? The Pakistan army is not camped in India, surely they have every right to be sent and go anywhere in Pakistan. Then why has a border been drawn in Swat and no-go areas established for the army by the Taliban? Recently four soldiers were captured in Khwazakhela on suspicion of spying for the government. Who gave them that authority and what is being done about it?
According to the Taliban, the property of most of the landlords in Swat is 'privatised and now belongs to the government of Swat'. Since the government of Pakistan maintains there is no parallel government in Swat, is it the federal or the provincial government that our property now belongs to? You might say the people of Swat wanted the NAR. It is not easy to remain seated in your shop when armed murderers tell you to go to a rally. You are not given a choice when you are ordered to stage a protest, because your home is not the sanctuary it used to be and you know the army, the police and the government won't step in to protect you when the people of Pakistan are being plunged into further denial by their own government.


Peace deals are an annual event in Swat. Every winter when leaves are shed, cover is poor and the Taliban scattered or diminished in numbers, they become amenable to peace. Come summer they are replenished with men freshly recruited during the winter, more sons from more families in Swat, resulting in greater support and more places of sanctuary. Their fighters are released by the government; the army is withdrawn and consequently must fight all over again for areas they controlled last season. This time, the 'peace deal' has allowed the Taliban to advance to Buner, Shangla, and Dir lower and upper, with stirrings in Nowshera and Mardan. They are also recruiting men from those districts, locals who cannot be sent back to Swat.


We are Muslims but we do not want the Taliban's version of Sharia, the one that allows the murder of Muslims and innocent human beings, theft of their property and oppression of the worst kind. During the crusades, Muslims wore crosses around their necks in order to escape persecution at the hands of Christians. Now, Muslims wear beards in order to escape persecution at the hands of creatures who call themselves Muslim. This is happening in a state within a state; it used to be called Swat. Now, its whispered name is Talibanistan, and its new ruler is an illiterate cart-driver who has brought the Pakistan government to heel and cowed our mighty army.


Noor Khan
From Swat (and currently in Islamabad)


*****


I am totally unable to understand two things out of this whole situation of Talibanisation. One, when will the army play its role? The army chief has made a bold and blunt statement but when will this be backed up with equally bold and blunt action against the Taliban? Second, a leader in Swat, who seems to have a large local following said in public that he does not accept the constitution or the judiciary or even parliament. This is another way of saying that he does not even accept the existence of Pakistan. Why does not the Chief Justice of Pakistan ask him to appear in court? What are we waiting for?


Uzair Alvi
Islamabad


*****


Every second Pakistani I meet in Malaysia is from Buner. Most of them sell carpets, dresses, home decorations and electronic appliances. Their job is not easy — because they have to sell door-to-door. It seems many families in Buner have at least one member working in Malaysia. All of them are fearful of the Taliban's takeover of their district — and most, if not all, also say that they don't understand why the army is not there to fight the Taliban. The sad and unfortunate thing is that we are not even fighting the Taliban.


An ashamed Punjabi
Kedah, Malaysia


*****


General Musharraf was doing the right thing by starting a military operation in FATA and Swat two years back. He had succeeded in dismantling their infrastructure and forced them out of Swat but unfortunately all political parties along with the media made such a hue and cry that everything had to be stopped. The army had succeeded in driving out the militants from most of Swat, until the ANP government agreed to a dialogue. During this time, they re-entered Swat and consolidated themselves and killed all those who had supported the army. The consequence of that was that the indigenous population became thoroughly afraid and the situation became much like that of a few men keeping a much larger group of people hostage — with the government giving in, perhaps out of the safety of the people of Swat.
Now the Taliban stand exposed to people of Pakistan — I have not met a single person who supports these monsters. Everyone in the country wants swift, speedy and transparent judiciary but they don't want the Taliban to be given a district under this pretext. They also want the government and the military to take decisive action against the Taliban.


Ijaz Ahmad
Karachi


*****


I feel no shame in admitting that I was among the ignorant who actually thought that 'Nizam-e-Adl' would bring hope to the Swatis. To me, a student safely residing in Lahore, the 'truce' between the government and the Taliban put an end to the ongoing civil war. It halted the wastage of our own resources against our own people, the destruction of one of the best tourist destinations of the world. I saw no harm in the establishment of a 'legislative system' that mirrored the consent of the people abiding there. For me, Nizam-e-Adl was a cloud named peace and amnesty with a silver lining. It signalled the rebuilding of the ruins. It meant the saving of innocent lives that were caught up in between the two forces, the saving of defence inventory, the revival of tourism. It signalled hope for all.
Little had I known that what I had thought to be a solution would take shape of Talibanisation, which reminds me of Afghanistan. It is now that I give a second thought to the reports of a girl's flogging which was not a media hoax after all. I think of the eradication of girls' schools, women health centres. The Taliban are an ominous force vowing to put an end to the women education and development and forcibly drive us back to the medieval times. I am insecure in my own city. There is a dread, a terror of someone shutting down my institution, or worse blowing it up. Every little news of the success of the Taliban mounts this trepidation. What would our fate be? Will Pakistan become another Afghanistan?


Nadia Rauf
Kinnaird College,
Lahore


*****


I am crying while I am writing this. What is going to happen to Pakistan? These Taliban are not Muslims. They are not even Pakistanis. They are animals because humans don't behave the way they do. Why are our government and army not fighting them? Why are they letting them advance and take over country's territory everyday?


Nabiha Khattak
Islamabad


*****


We do not need American threats to take us back to the Stone Age as we are doing this ourselves by legalising Nizam-e-Adl and will soon see the result on women's rights and women's education. Men will also have to fall in line with the non-appealable decisions given by the Qazi courts.


Khurram Muzaffar
Rawalpindi


*****


When parts of Pakistan are falling to the 'hirsute brigade', the leadership from Punjab remains silent. They must remember that historically the storm that gathers at Hindukush reaches the gates of Delhi!


Pir M Shah

Muslim links peace talks with establishment of Darul Qaza

Updated at: 2315 PST, Tuesday, April 28, 2009 

SWAT: Tehrik Taliban Swat spokesman Muslim Khan said Tuesday that peace talks would resume only after establishment of the Darul Qaza in Malakand region.
Talking to Geo TV, he denied that Taliban were not present in Dir. And said whatever being said in this regard was false.
Khan said that the government should have kept its promise about Darul Qaza and appointment of Qazis.
He said that “Our children rendered sacrifices for the enforcement of Nizam-e-Adl Regulation.”
“If government took one step towards implementation of Sharia laws. We will take 10 steps?” he said.

Source

Battle for hearts & minds

By Shahid Javed Burki Tuesday, 28 Apr, 2009 | 09:32 AM PST |

Extremist have not met residence from less radical and saner elements. —AFP/File Photo

The Washington Post headlined a recent story on the latest developments in Pakistan ‘Extremist tide rises in Pakistan’.

The story ran on the front page; its subtitle was even more revealing about the worry that is now consuming many in America and the West about Pakistan’s future.  ‘After reaching deal in north, Islamists aim to install religious law nationwide’ read the story’s subhead. The story was built around the statement of Sufi Mohammad, the Swat cleric who had campaigned for decades to bring the Sharia to his part of the world. The newspaper reported that he was now determined to extend his campaign beyond Swat.
The threat was carried out a few days later. On April 22, the western press reported that the Taliban had walked into the district of Buner, south of Swat and nearer Islamabad than the Swat valley. Alarm bells began to ring loudly in Washington. On the same day that the Taliban were reported to have advanced into Buner, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton appeared before the House Foreign Relations Committee whose chairman, Howard L. Berman, had prepared a bill that would allow highly conditional economic and military aid to Pakistan.
Ms Clinton called the Taliban advances an existential threat to Pakistan and called upon its people to put pressure on the government not to continue to cede territory to the insurgents. The government’s lack of resolve was hurting not only Pakistan but could have dire consequences for the rest of the world. She said that Pakistan was becoming a ‘mortal threat to the security and safety of our country and the world’.

Earlier in the week, The New York Times put on its front page a picture showing a large crowd gathered to hear Maulana Abdul Aziz who was chief cleric at the Lal Masjid in Islamabad before the military action in July 2007. The commando attack killed the cleric’s brother and scores of others. The cleric managed to escape by wearing a burka. The picture showed a bullet- riddled car parked in the middle of the congregation as a symbol for those who had come to listen to the cleric.

His attendance at the mosque was made possible by the Supreme Court’s decision to grant him bail. The car was meant to remind the prayer congregation that the struggle to bring Islam to Pakistan would not be easy and that it would be resisted by the state that still had a near-monopoly on power to impose its will. But the state’s will to resist seems to be weakening.
Western newspapers are not the only ones worrying about Pakistan’s future. Policymakers in most western capitals have reached three conclusions. One, that even judged by the standards set by a very violent world that is shaping up in the early years of the 21st century, Pakistan is the most dangerous place on earth.

Two, several influential policymakers are worried that Pakistan’s defences have been lowered to the point where the rest of the country may be overcome by radical Islam. A few days ago Richard Holbrooke, the US envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan, told a TV audience that Pakistanis need to worry about the government’s decision to compromise with the clerics in Swat. ‘That ought to be a wake-up call to everybody in Pakistan that you can’t deal with these people by giving away territory as they creep closer and closer to the populated centres of the Punjab and Islamabad.’

Three, that if Pakistan crumbles it will create a tsunami that will hit many distant shores. It is in this context that the statement by President Asif Ali Zardari at Tokyo where he led the Pakistani side at the Friends of Pakistan meeting resonated well in western capitals. The president told his audience that if Pakistan fails the world fails.  All this is a preamble to a simple question: why have the people of Pakistan allowed this to happen? ‘This’ refers to the allowance that has been given to some clerics to openly defy the state, to reject the rule of established law, to show great contempt for most social norms accepted by the vast majority in society.

They are doing this in an attempt to establish a social and political order that conforms only to their liking. Why is it that a small group of people believe that they have the licence to impose their will on the country when it has been shown in election after election that a vast majority of the citizenry does not support the point of view these people hold and want to force down millions of reluctant throats? The answer is as simple as the question. This has happened because the extremists have not met resistance from less radical and saner elements in the country — elements who believe in democracy, the rule of law and personal rights, in particular the rights of women.

Pakistani society can be divided into three parts: the top five per cent or so in terms of income distribution, the middle 50 per cent and the bottom 45 per cent. What has happened in the last couple of decades, as the state failed to provide appropriate services to the citizenry, is that the first class of people have bought insurance for themselves by essentially sealing themselves off from the rest of society. They have their own system of security, their own power supply, their own educational system and their own health services.

The Middle East offers them escape from the country; they go to Dubai to shop and take a vacation. A significant proportion of the middle class, numbering about 85 million, has placed its faith in a democratic system of government. Almost 70 per cent of them voted for the mainstream parties. It was this class that provided the lawyers’ movement the support it needed to battle the state.

There was a moment of extraordinary euphoria after March 16 when this class of citizenry won the restoration of the judiciary. Why is it now showing ambivalence towards the spread of extremism that challenges the social norms to which it subscribes? There are two answers to this question. This class is waiting for leadership to emerge that will mobilise and organise them. But there is also a section in this class that has swung in the direction of extremism.

Those who have done so have taken the plunge either because of conviction or because of the failure of the state to provide them with their basic needs. They need to be brought back to the fold.

Then there are the poor, 75 million in all. For them life is a struggle and the state an indifferent and increasingly irrelevant presence. The battle for Pakistan will be fought with the aim to keep the middle class convinced that their best option is to continue to put their faith in the Pakistani state. How can they be persuaded to stay on board is the question for next week.

Source

Tableeghi jamaat rejects gunpoint Sharia

Updated at: 1258 PST,  Tuesday, April 28, 2009
Tableeghi jamaat rejects gunpoint Sharia 

ISLAMABAD: The top leaders of the Tableeghi Jamaat have denounced enforcement of Sharia at gunpoint, religious extremism, militancy and terrorism.
Leaders of the Jamaat also called for promoting inter-faith harmony, tolerance, human rights, social justice and peace.
They were speaking at the conclusion of a three-day congregation near here. ‘Shariah cannot be enforced at gunpoint,’ declared Haji Abdul Wahab, Amir of the Tableeghi Jamaat, Pakistan.
Had that been the case, Allah Almighty would have sent fierce angels to protect prophets and enforce their faiths, he said.
The scholar cited the example of Prophet Mohammad (PBUH), said the Holy Prophet never used force. Instead he spread the word of God only by peaceful means.
Haji Abdul Wahab also condemned extremism and militancy in the name of Islam. The congregation of tens of thousands of people was also addressed by Maulana Jamshaid, Maulana Mohammad Ahmed and Mualana Fahim.

Source

2 policemen abducted in Swat

Updated at: 1528 PST,  Tuesday, April 28, 2009
2 policemen abducted in Swat 

SWAT: Gunmen kidnapped two police personnel as a house of local lawyer has been seized in Mingora.
Sources said unknown armed men opened fire on a police mobile patrolling near Bahrain chowk and kidnapped two policemen. One personnel injured during firing was shifted to hospital.
Unknown persons in Nawan Kali, a remote area of Mingora, abducted a policeman whereas Taliban seized the house of a local lawyer Ali Haider in Kokri area. He was threatened yesterday on FM radio for opposing Taliban.

Source

Taliban ask media to correct its role

Updated at: 1937 PST,  Tuesday, April 28, 2009


Taliban ask media to correct its roleSWAT: Tehrik Taliban Swat has warned that media should correct its role.
Commander ‘Fidain’ section has dispatched pamphlets to the offices of newspapers and TV channels, which said that media should examine its role and avoid an anti-Taliban agenda.
According to the pamphlets, media has adopted a new approach for the past one week which indicates that everybody is following a pro-Western policy under any pressure or greed.
“It is the duty of media to give space and time to such statements that leave a positive impact on the society,” it said.
Taliban further warned that they would move to Sharia courts if instructions were not followed.

Source

Five policemen kidnapped, 11 suspects arrested in Swat

Updated at: 2210 PST,  Tuesday, April 28, 2009
Five policemen kidnapped, 11 suspects arrested in Swat SWAT: Five policemen have been kidnapped while security forces arrested 11 suspects here on Tuesday.
According to sources, militants attacked a police checkpost located in the outskirts of Mingora and kidnapped three policemen.
Earlier, unidentified gunmen fired on a police party in Bahrain area injuring one while another policeman was abducted. Security forces arrested 11 suspected militants from Fizzaghat checkpost and shifted them to an undisclosed location.

Source

Talks suspended between govt, Taliban

Monday, 27 Apr, 2009 | 09:26 PM PST |

Talks between the Pakistan Taliban and the government over the Swat valley have been suspended until the army halts its latest operation against militants, a negotiator said on Monday. — AP/File Photo

MINGORA: The Tehrik-i-Nifaz-i-Shariat Muhammadi (TNSM) has announced suspension of talks with the NWFP government in protest against the military operation launched in Lower Dir.

TNSM spokesman Amir Izzat Khan told journalists here on Monday that negotiations would remain suspended till the operation was halted and the government contacted the TNSM leadership.

He said the government had violated the Swat agreement by sending troops to Lower Dir without taking the TNSM into confidence.

JUST THE START

Lower Dir and Swat are part of the Malakand division where Zardari sanctioned the imposition of Islamic sharia law this month after a peace deal with Sufi Mohammad aimed at ending militant violence.

Paramilitary officials said Mohammad was unable to leave his home in Lower Dir's Maidan village due to a curfew.

A spokesman for Sufi Mohammad said there would be no further dialogue with the government until it stopped its operation.

‘We are suspending talks with the government until the military operation in Dir is halted,’ said Ameer Izzat, a spokesman for Sufi Mohammad, said.

‘Our council of leaders met on Sunday night and decided to suspend peace negotiations with the government in North West Frontier Province,’ said Ameer Izzat.
‘We, however, still adhere to the February deal,’ that put three million people under sharia law, Izzat said.

Mohammad had been negotiating for a speedier implementation of sharia courts in Swat, while the government wants the Taliban to fulfil their side of the bargain by laying down arms.

A Taliban spokesman in Swat, 125 km northwest of Islamabad, breathed defiance following the operation in Dir.

‘The more they carry out operations the more we will expand across Pakistan,’ Taliban spokesman Muslim Khan said.

Pakistan's allies want to see coherent, decisive action by Islamabad against militants, rather than policies of appeasement, and many Pakistanis have come round to a similar view.

‘The only option is to take action,’ said retired brigadier Mehmood Shah, a former chief of security in northwest Pakistan.

Shah expected the operation in Dir to be over soon, but saw chances for a larger offensive in Swat given the Taliban's recalcitrance.

‘If these people do not deliver on their part of the agreement... I think there is no other option with the government,’ he said.

FAMILIES FLEE

Security forces launched the offensive in Lower Dir, about 170 km northwest of the capital Islamabad, after militants attacked a convoy of paramilitary troops and 12 children were killed by a bomb hidden in a football.

Helicopter gunships and artillery targetted militant hideouts in the villages of Lal Qala and Islam Qala, and families poured out of the region, which lies to the west of Swat.

Sporadic artillery fire was heard overnight and on Monday morning and residents saw a helicopter circling the area.

‘Search and cordon operations are being carried out to capture or flush out militants,’ the military spokesman said.

Alarm bells had rung in Washington last week after Taliban fighters moved into Buner valley, south of Swat and just 100 km northwest of Islamabad.

On Friday, with expectations growing of a military operation, Taliban commander Fazlullah, ordered his men to pull back to Swat, but officials and residents said armed fighters who hailed from Buner were still present.

pakistan TNSM warns government over operation

Tuesday, 28 Apr, 2009 | 10:12 PM PST |

A Pakistani army helicopter patrols in the district of Lower Dir, where security forces launched an operation against militants. -AP Photo

SWAT: While addressing a news conference, Naib Ameer Maulana Mohammad Alam warned the government to stop its military operation and use of force in Dir, otherwise it would be responsible for bitter consequences.

'There is no justification for the operation in Dir. The government has already lost control in 80 per cent of Swat and would soon the lose rest if it did not stop the operation', he said.

'After an agreement, a ceasefire took place, whatever happened afterwards was due to the delay in setting up Dar-ul-Qaza', he said.

Neither are the Taliban destroying official buildings nor were they carrying out attacks', he said, adding that, 'peace can only be restored through talks not force'.

Alam said that Maulana Sufi Mohammad would ask the Taliban to lay down their arms after establishment of Dar-ul-Qaza and the appointment of a Qazi under Nizam-e-Adl regulations.

'Innocent people are being killed in military operation District Dir,' he said. Alam also said that peace had been restored in Malakand division and only fell apart after the government violated the agreement.

Source

Up to one million displaced in northwest Pakistan

Tuesday, 28 Apr, 2009 | 07:24 PM PST |

Local residents flee from a troubled area in northwest Pakistan where the military has launched an operation against the Taliban. -AFP Photo

GENEVA: Up to one million people are displaced in northwestern Pakistan where militants are feeding on local discontent and strife, humanitarian and local officials from Pakistan warned on Tuesday.

Officials from Pakistan's North West Frontier Province appealed for international relief aid at an unprecedented meeting with relief agencies and donor countries in Geneva.

'We are hearing a lot of pledges and promises made from the international community to Pakistan, and many of them are for security, for the police and the army, but the civilians are not getting what they are supposed to,' said Sitara Ayaz, minister for social welfare and development in the province.

'In our province we need more support and help from the international community,' she said after the two-day meeting in Geneva.

The UN's World Food Programme is working on an estimate of about 600,000 people for food aid in the area, spokewoman Emilia Casella told AFP.

Local officials put the figure at closer to one million, with about 80 per cent of them housed with friends or relatives, sometimes five or six families to a home.

'It is a serious humanitarian situation of major magnitude,' warned Dennis McNamara, an adviser at the Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue, which organised the meeting.

'The registered UN figure for displaced civilians is over half a million. The NWFP relief commissioner says if we get registration completed it may be closer to a million in total.'

'It is a certainly a major displacement, one of the world's biggest if these figures are right,' added McNamara, a former senior UN refugee official.

A provincial minister said in Pakistan on Tuesday that around 30,000 people in the northwest have been displaced since the weekend by a military offensive to flush out Taliban militants.

Participants at the Geneva meeting said impoverished civilians were paying the price for the unrest and the humanitarian strife, and were easily wooed by militants such as the Taliban.

'They can easily be recruited, because they are bitter and they have suffered,' said one of the participants from North West Frontier Province.

Source

Where has Sufi Mohammad gone?

Bureau Report
Tuesday, 28 Apr, 2009 | 05:28 AM PST |

Sufi Mohammad was last seen leaving for his home in Lal Qila area from his base camp in Maidan on Saturday afternoon.—AP

PESHAWAR: The government as well as followers of Sufi Mohammad's defunct Tehrik-i-Nifaz-i-Shariat Muhammadi are looking for him for one reason: to start talks to remove the last few remaining hurdles in the enforcement of Nizam-i-Adl Regulation.

Sufi Mohammad was last seen leaving for his home in Lal Qila area from his base camp in Maidan on Saturday afternoon. 

On Sunday morning, according to his spokesman Ameer Izzat, the cleric started for his base camp along with his son Ziaullah, just when the paramilitary forces moved in to attack militants’ hideout in Lal Qila.

‘The last time we had contact with Sufi Sahib was when he said he was on his way to Maidan. He said that he wanted to return home but he was not allowed to proceed by security people because of the fighting there,’ Ameer Izzat said.

‘There has been no communication since then and we don’t know where he is. Everybody is looking for him. We are looking for him. The government is looking for him. We are concerned. We want him to come back and resume talks to resolve the pending issues.’

Ironically, the NWFP government faces the same predicament. It desperately needs to start talks and announce the remaining steps for the implementation of the recently-announced regulation but it does not know where to find the TNSM chief. 

In fact, a two-member team of the NWFP government comprising Senator Afrasiab Khattak and Information Minister Mian Iftikhar Hussain flew into Upper Dir on Monday. But Sufi was nowhere to be seen.

Anxious to resolve the remaining issues, the government is believed to have reached out to all those who could locate Sufi Mohammed. One significant announcement would be the setting up of Darul Qaza in Malakand. 

This would be a major stride in the full implementation of the regulation but before it does so, the government would like to consult the unpredictable TNSM leader. 

The TNSM wants the operation to be halted and one reason for the demand is to help find their leader, who is known for his disappearing antics.

In 1994, when the TNSM had launched an armed rebellion against the state for enforcement of Sharia in Malakand, Sufi was literally pulled out from the mountains by a helicopter to negotiate a settlement.

Sufi had agreed and went along with government officials to disarm his supporters and dislodge them from the mountains.

Source